WHO's handlers terrified of international resistance to the corporate coup. This letter, led by a warmonger, is evidence.
WHO chose Genocidal Gordan Brown to lead 100+ 'Global Leaders' call for 'Government Agreement' on 'International Deal' on 'Future Pandemics'. Rather join the WCH's press conference & expert hearing
I received an outrageous and yet satisfying email from the WHO this morning. Clearly, its funders and beneficiaries are running scared. This is thanks to our tireless international efforts to protect health, freedom and sovereignty.
Not only did WHO endorse a Director-General accused of terrorism (watch my show on CHD.TV), but it now asked Gordan Brown, a genocidal war industry sock puppet to lead an open call to support the WHO facilitated corporate coup. Why would anyone trust him, or Tedros?
Gordan Brown is a war criminal. Refresh your memory on the horrors he is complicit in by reading the two articles below. My good friend John Stone sent me evidence on Brown’s repugnant role during Covid-19. Links at the end.
Then, read WHO’s email and the Open Letter by Genocidal Gordan & Company. At the end of the open letter is a list of people and organisations supporting it and by extension the WHO agenda.
Image: Architects of Corporate Engineered Terror join forces for global corporate coup
Article 1: Morning Star Online
“The US-British attack on Iraq and the chaos it caused led to 500,000 deaths, according to a 2013 PLOS Medicine journal study, and over 4.2 million people displaced by 2007, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency.
Brown has direct responsibility for the destruction of Iraq. As the Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1997 to 2007 — the second most powerful person in the government after Tony Blair — he oversaw the financing of the war.”
As a senior cabinet minister he also had collective responsibility for the decision to invade. Andrew Rawnsley explained Brown’s role in the immediate run-up to the war in his 2010 book End Of The Party: The Rise And Fall Of New Labour. On March 17 2003 “Brown gave an unequivocal statement of public support and threw himself into the effort to win over Labour MPs.” “In the final days [before the invasion] Gordon was absolutely core,” senior Blair aide Sally Morgan said.
Brown was also chancellor for the illegal invasion of Afghanistan and then prime minister from 2007-2010. According to Brown University’s Costs of War research project, as of 2021 an estimated 176,000 people had died in the near 20-year Afghan war, including around 46,000 civilians
After his staff interviewed over 600 people with first-hand experience of the Afghan war, the head of the US government’s Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction told the Washington Post that “the American people have constantly been lied to” for 20 years.
Brown’s “leadership” certainly helped to change Iraq’s education system. A 2004 Unicef survey found “over 700 primary schools had been damaged by bombing... with more than 200 burned and over 3,000 looted” since the US-British invasion in March 2003.“Iraq used to have one of the finest school systems in the Middle East,” commented Unicef Iraq representative Roger Wright. “The current system is effectively denying children a decent education.” Brown University’s Costs of War project found similar impacts on Iraq’s higher education sector: “The Iraq war resulted in the decimation of Iraqi universities, through looting, violence against academics and the removal of Iraq’s intellectual leadership.”
Public (Education) Interest: Photo Credit - Chris J Ratcliffe via Getty Images
Article 2: The GuardianNo one can credibly deny that the invasion of Iraq met the Nuremberg definition. The Chilcot inquiry, whose terms were set by Brown when he was prime minister, was forbidden to pronounce on the legality of the war. But it concluded that “the UK chose to join the invasion of Iraq before the peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted. Military action at that time was not a last resort.”
In other words, it failed to meet the UN charter’s criteria for legal warfare. The former law lord, Lord Steyn, came to the same conclusion: “In the absence of a second UN resolution authorising invasion, it was illegal”. The former lord chief justice, Lord Bingham, called the Iraq war “a serious violation of international law”. A Dutch inquiry, led by a former supreme court judge, found that the invasion had “no sound mandate in international law”.
The government in which Brown was chancellor was repeatedly warned that its planned invasion would be illegal. A year before the war, the then foreign secretary, Jack Straw, explained that for a war to be legal, “i) There must be an armed attack upon a State or such an attack must be imminent; ii) The use of force must be necessary and other means to reverse/avert the attack must be unavailable; iii) The acts in self-defence must be proportionate and strictly confined to the object of stopping the attack”.
None of these conditions applied. The Foreign Office, according to its deputy legal adviser, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, consistently counselled that an invasion would be unlawful without a new UN resolution. She explained that “an unlawful use of force on such a scale amounts to the crime of aggression”. A Cabinet Office memo warned: “A legal justification for invasion would be needed. Subject to Law Officers’ advice, none currently exists.”
Instead of facing justice, the killers walk among us, respected, revered, treated as the elder statesmen to whom media and governments turn for counsel. Brown can pose as an august humanitarian. Alastair Campbell, who oversaw the compilation of the “dodgy dossier”, which provided a false case for war, and is therefore as complicit as any of Putin’s “henchmen”, has been thoroughly screenwashed: in other words, rehabilitated, like other grim political figures, by television. He is now treated as a kind of national agony uncle.
Please read and share my critical article on Sanctions via the UN and WHO
Feedback from a former United Nations worker: “Please allow me to congratulate you. I thought your article was excellent; extremely thorough and comprehensive. Among lots of important points you raised, I particularly liked the one about Ultra Vires. This is the case in many respects. And that increasingly seems to apply to so many other supranational entities too.”
Here is the WHO’s PR email sent today:
Dear journalists:
FYI, please find below a press release concerning this joint open letter by Mr Gordon Brown, WHO Ambassador for Sustainable Global Health Finance, UN Special Envoy for Global Education and former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and more than 100 world leaders and experts on the pandemic agreement being negotiated by WHO Member States. An op-ed version of the open letter is also available here.
Regards, WHO Media team
PRESS RELEASE
March 20, 2024
A high-powered intervention by 23 former national Presidents, 22 former Prime Ministers, a former UN General Secretary and 3 Nobel Laureates is being made today to press for an urgent agreement from international negotiators on a Pandemic Accord, under the Constitution of the World Health Organizaion, to bolster the world’s collective preparedness and response to future pandemics.
Former UN General Secretary Ban-ki Moon, New Zealand’s former Prime Minister Helen Cark, former UK Prime Ministers Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, former Malawi President Joyce Banda, former Peru President Franciso Sagasti, and 3 former Presidents of the UN General Assembly are amongst 100+ global leaders, from all continents and fields of politics, economics and health management who today issued a joint open letter urging accelerated progress in current negotiations to reach the world’s first ever multi-lateral agreement on pandemic preparedness and prevention.
“A pandemic accord is critical to safeguard our collective future. Only a strong global pact on pandemics can protect future generations from a repeat of the COVID-19 crisis, which led to millions of deaths and caused widespread social and economic devastation, owing not least to insufficient international collaboration,” the leaders write in their joint letter.
In the throes of the Covid-19 disaster which, officially, claimed 7 million lives and wiped $2 trillion from the world economy, inter-governmental negotiations to reach international agreement on future pandemic non-proliferation were begun in December 2021 between 194 of the world’s 196 nations. Nations set themselves the deadline of May 2024 by which they should reach agreement on what would be the world’s first ever Pandemic Accord.
The ninth round of Pandemic Accord negotiations are underway this week and next. Signatories of today’s open letter hope their combined influence will encourage all 194 nations to maintain the courage of their Covid-years conviction and make their own collective ambition of an international pandemic protocol a reality by the intended May deadline to enable stratification by the World Health Assembly at its May 2024 Annual General Assembly.
And they urge negotiators “to redouble their efforts” to meet the imminent deadline and not let their efforts be blown off course by malicious misinformation campaigning against the WHO, the international organisation which would be tasked with implementing the new health accord.
Taking a swipe at those who wrongly believe national sovereignty may be undermined by this major international step forward for public health the signatories say “there is no time to waste” and they call on the leaders of the 194 nations taking part in the current negotiations to “redouble their efforts to complete the accord by the May deadline.”
The letter, hosted on the website of The Office of Gordon and Sarah Brown states, “Countries are doing this not because of some dictum from the WHO – like the negotiations, participation in any instrument would be entirely voluntary – but because they need what the accord can and must offer. In fact, a pandemic accord would deliver vast and universally shared benefits, including greater capacity to detect new and dangerous pathogens, access to information about pathogens detected elsewhere in the world, and timely and equitable delivery of tests, treatments, vaccines, and other lifesaving tools.
“As countries enter what should be the final stages of the negotiations, governments must work to refute and debunk false claims about the accord.
At the same time, negotiators must ensure that the agreement lives up to its promise to prevent and mitigate pandemic-related risks. This requires, for example, provisions aimed at ensuring that when another pandemic threat does arise, all relevant responses – from reporting the identification of risky pathogens to delivering tools like tests and vaccines on an equitable basis – are implemented quickly and effectively. As the COVID-19 pandemic showed, collaboration between the public and private sectors focused on advancing the public good is also essential.”
“A new pandemic threat will emerge; there is no excuse not to be ready for it. It is thus imperative to build an effective, multisectoral, and multilateral approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Given the unpredictable nature of public-health risks, a global strategy must embody a spirit of openness and inclusiveness. There is no time to waste, which is why we are calling on all national leaders to redouble their efforts to complete the accord by the May deadline.”
“Beyond protecting countless lives and livelihoods, the timely delivery of a global pandemic accord would send a powerful message: even in our fractured and fragmented world, international cooperation can still deliver global solutions to global problems.”
Ends
Please watch this show on CHD.TV and share it widely. We have a right to know.
Here is The Open Letter by the 100+ ‘global leaders’, many of whom we never elected and who never ask our opinions on anything, but who patronise us at every opportunity:
Joint letter to leaders of WHO member states calling for an urgent agreement on a pandemic accord
20 MARCH, 2024
To Leaders of WHO Member States,
The overwhelming lesson we learned from COVID-19 is that no one is safe anywhere until everyone is safe everywhere – and that can only happen through collaboration. In response, the 194 countries which are members of the World Health Organization decided in December 2021 to launch negotiations for a new international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, a Pandemic Accord, as a “global framework” to work together to prepare for and stem any new pandemic threat, including by achieving equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
Negotiation of an effective pandemic accord is a much needed opportunity to safeguard the world we live in. Countries themselves have proposed this instrument, individual countries are negotiating it, and only countries will ultimately be responsible for its requirements and its success or failure.
Establishing a strong global pact on pandemics will protect future generations from a repeat of the millions of deaths and the social and economic devastation which resulted from a lack of collaboration during theCOVID-19 pandemic. All countries need what the accord can offer: the capacity to detect and share pathogens presenting a risk, and timely access to tests, treatments and vaccines.
An agreement is meant to be reached just two and a half months from now – countries imposed a deadline of May 2024, in time for the 77th World Health Assembly.
As countries now enter what should be the final stages of the negotiations, they must ensure that they are agreeing on actions which will do the job required: to prevent and mitigate pandemic threats. We urge solutions which ensure both speed in reporting and sharing pathogens, and in access – in every country – to sufficient tools like tests and vaccines to protect lives and minimise harm. The public and private sectors must work together towards the public good.
This global effort is being threatened by misinformation and disinformation. Among the falsehoods circulating are allegations that the WHO intends to monitor people’s movements through digital passports; that it will take away the national sovereignty of countries; and that it will have the ability to deploy armed troops to enforce mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns. All of these claims are wholly false and governments must work to disavow them with clear facts.
It is imperative now to build an effective, multisectoral and multilateral approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response marked by a spirit of openness and inclusiveness. In doing so we can send a message that even in this fractured and fragmented world, cross-border co-operation can deliver global solutions to global problems.
We call on leaders of all countries to step up their efforts and secure an effective pandemic accord by May. A new pandemic threat will emerge – and there is no excuse not to be ready for it.
Name TitleCarlos Alvarado* President of Costa Rica (2018-2022)
Michelle Bachelet* President of Chile (2006-2010)
Jan Peter Balkenende* Prime Minister of The Netherlands (2002-2010)
Ban Ki-moon* Eighth Secretary General of the United Nations
Joyce Banda* President of Malawi (2012-2014)
Kjell Magne Bondevik* Prime Minister of Norway (1997-2000; 2001-2005)
Kim Campbell* Prime Minister of Canada (1993)
Alfred Gusenbauer* Chancellor of Austria (2007-2008)
Seung-Soo Han* Prime Minister of the Rep. of Korea (2008-2009)
Mehdi Jomaa* Prime Minister of Tunisia (2014-2015)
Horst Köhler* President of Germany (2004-2010)
Rexhep Meidani* President of Albania (1997-2002)
Mario Monti* Prime Minister of Italy (2011-2013)
Francisco Sagasti* President of Peru (2020-2021)
Jenny Shipley* Prime Minister of New Zealand (1997-1999)
Juan Somavía* Ninth Director of the International Labour Organization
Helen Clark** Former Prime Minister of New Zealand
Micheline Calmy-Rey** Former President of the Swiss Confederation
Baroness Lynda Chalker** Former Minister of Overseas Development of the UK
Chester A. Crocker** Former Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, USA
Marzuki Darusman** Former Attorney General of Indonesia
Mohamed ElBaradei** Former Vice President of Egypt
Gareth Evans** Former Foreign Minister of Australia
Lawrence Gonzi** Former Prime Minister of Malta
Lord George Robertson** Former Secretary General of NATO
Gordon Brown Former Prime Minister of the UK 2007-2010
Vaira Vike-Freiberga*** Co-Chair, NGIC; President of Latvia 1999-2007
Ismail Serageldin*** Co-Chair, NGIC; Vice President of the World Bank 1992-2000
Kerry Kennedy*** President, Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights
Rosen Plevneliev*** President of Bulgaria 2012-2017
Petar Stoyanov*** President of Bulgaria 1997-2002
Chiril Gaburici*** Prime Minister of Moldova 2015
Mladen Ivanic*** Member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2014-2018
Zlatko Lagumdzija*** Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the UN; Prime Minister 2001-2002; Deputy Prime Minister 1993-1996, 2012-2015
Rashid Alimov*** Secretary-General Shanghai Cooperation Organization 2016-2018
Jan Fisher*** Prime Minister of the Czech Republic 2009-2010
Sir Tony Blair Prime Minister of the UK 1997-2007
Csaba Korossi*** 77th President of the UN General Assembly
Maria Fernanda Espinosa*** 73rd President of the UN General Assembly
Volkan Bozkir*** 75th President of the UN General Assembly
Ameenah Gurib Fakim*** President of Mauritius 2015-2018
Filip Vujanovic*** President of Montenegro 2003-2018
Borut Pahor*** President of Slovenia 2012-2022; Prime Minister 2008-2012
Ivo Josipovic*** President of Croatia 2010-2015
Petru Lucinschi*** President of Moldova 1997-2001
Boris Tadic*** President of Serbia 2004-2012
Mirko Cvetkovic*** Prime Minister of Serbia 2008-2012
Dumitru Bragish*** Prime Minister of Moldova 1999-2001
Emil Constantinescu*** President of Romania 1996-2000
Nambaryn Enkhbayar*** President of Mongolia 2005-2009
Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic*** President of Croatia 2015-2020
Gjorge Ivanov*** President of North Macedonia 2009-2019
Valdis Zatlers*** President of Latvia 2007-2011
Ana Birchall*** Deputy Prime Minister of Romania 2018-2019
Hikmet Cetin*** Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey 1991-1994
Jewel Howard Taylor*** Vice President of Liberia 2018-2024
Djoomart Otorbayev*** Prime Minister of Kyrgyzstan 2014-2015
Julio Cobos*** Vice President of Argentina 2007-2011
Ouided Bouchmani*** Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 2015
Abdul Rauf AlRawabdeh*** Prime Minister of Jordan 1999-2000
Jadranka Kosor*** Prime Minister of Montenegro 2009-2011
Milica Pejanovic*** Minister of Defense of Montenegro 2012-2016
Mats Karlsson*** Former Vice-President of the World Bank
Laimdota Straujuma*** Prime Minister of Latvia 2014-2016
Eka Tkeshelashvili*** Deputy Prime Minister of Georgia 2010-2012, Minister of Foreign Affairs 2010
Moushira Khattab*** Former Minister of State for Family and Population of Egypt
Raimonds Vejonis*** President of Latvia 2015-2019
Ilir Meta*** President of Albania 2017-2022
Edmond Panariti*** Former Minister of Foreign affairs, Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of Albania
Andris Piebalgs*** European Commissioner for Development 2010-2014, European Commissioner for Energy 2004-2010
Manuel Pulgar Vidal*** Climate and Energy Global Leader at the World Wide Fund for Nature, Minister of Environment of Peru 2011-2016, President of COP20
Yves Leterme*** Yves Leterme, Prime Minister of Belgium 2008, 2009-201
Rovshan Muradov*** Secretary-General of the Nizami Ganjavi International Center
Professor Erik Berglof London School of Economics and Political Science
Professor Justin Lin Beijing University
Professor Bai Chong-En Tsinghua School of Economics and Management Studies
Professor Robin Burgess London School of Economics and Political Science
Professor Shang-jin Wei Columbia University
Professor Harold James Princeton University
Ahmed Galal Former Minister of Finance, Egypt
Professor Jong-Wha Lee Korea University
Professor Leonhard Wantchekon African School of Economics, Benin
Professor Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden Mannheim University
Professor Kaushik Basu Cornell University
Professor Bengt Holmstrom Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Professor Mathias Dewatripont Université Libre de Bruxelles
Professor Dalia Marin University of Munich
Professor Richard Portes London Business School
Professor Chris Pissarides London School of Economics and Political Science
Professor Diane Coyle University of Cambridge
Mustapha Nabli Former Governor, Central Bank of Tunisia
Professor Wendy Carlin University College London
Professor Gerard Roland University of California, Berkeley
Professor Nora Lustig Tulane University
Piroska Nagy-Mohacsi London School of Economics and Political Science
Professor Philippe Aghion College de France
Professor Devi Sridhar University of Edinburgh
Yu Yongding Former President of China Society in the World Economy
Muhammad Yunus, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 2006
Kailash Satyarthe, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 2014
Sir Ivor Roberts Former UK Ambassador
Sir Suma Chakrabarti Former EBRD President
Sir Tim Hitchens Former UK Ambassador
Alistair Burt Former Minister for Health/International Development
Tom Fletcher Former UK Ambassador
Julian Braithwaite Former UK Perm Rep to WHO
John Casson Former UK Ambassador
*indicates membership of Club de Madrid
** Indicates membership of Global Leadership Forum
*** Indicates membership of NGIC
NOTE: Here are links to Gordan Brown’s insidious role during Covid-19:
“Gordon Brown first tried to exploit the Covid debacle 4 days after UK lockdown on 26 March 2020 to create a “One World Government” https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/26/gordon-brown-calls-for-global-government-to-tackle-coronavirus
An interesting article from 2020 on the ‘One World Government’ and Covid-19: https://jacobin.com/2020/07/one-world-government-democracy-covid-19/
Brown/Blair had made Gates an economic advisor to the British government in 2006: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/business-elite-to-tell-brown-how-to-boost-uk-economy-6105923.html
I wrote about this in my article about the return of David Cameron: https://www.ageofautism.com/2023/11/the-return-of-david-cameron-global-vaccine-salesman.html
It is actually the same crony network (doesn’t matter which party). Anyhow, Gordo has been angling for it for a long time.”
* Genocide is define as the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part. In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
* Crimes against humanity do not have a U.N. resolution, but they were defined by the Rome Statute. That talks about extermination or other crimes against civilian populations, and it does not have to happen in war, whereas war crimes have to happen in the context of war.CALL TO ACTION
1. Write to any and all these people explaining why We The People oppose WHO facilitated corporate colonialism. Share these letters in the comments. Or find them on Twitter (X) and let them know. Tag me: @ShabnamPalesaMo
2. Please join the World Council for Health’s human rights initiatives below
https://www.yaacovapelbaum.com/2020/03/23/when-tedros-moves-his-lips-beijing-speaks/